Sunday, November 7, 2010

This Week in TV

The Walking Dead
This week introduced to more of the regular characters, including one of my favorites:  Glen.  I was also worried at first that T-Dogg was going to be Tyreese (in the comic Tyreese is a huge ex-NFL linebacker).  It would have been upsetting to see redneck Michael Rooker beat the crap out of a linebacker.  Personally, I think AMC should reach out to Shawne Merriman.  His football career is about over, he would be perfect...

I also love that they are not trying to make each episode super scary, and over the top.  Go slow, pace it out.  Get to know the characters.  This is something that a show like this has over a typical zombie movie.  The characters can grow and we can really get to know them and like them before they are eaten.  It will make every death mean something.

Boardwalk Empire
When Nucky's brother, Eli, gets shot.  It really upset me.  I like Eli.  He makes me laugh and makes me sad.  I felt bad for him during his speech in a previous episode.  I want to see him succeed, but it looks like that will not happen.

Anyways, it seems that Jimmy will be coming back to New Jersey.  And I bet he brings ol "Phantom of the Opera Sniper" with him.  Also, did Jimmy have his mom sleep with Lucky Luciano in order to get information on him (and Lucky was banging her for the same reason, except that he thought she was Jimmy's wife)?  What a messed up family.

Did anyone else enjoy watching Arnold Rothstein practice what he would say about the Black Sox Scandal?  Apparently that was almost verbatim to his testimony to the Grand Jury.  Pretty cool.

Prop 19 failed

Last week, 53.8% of voters in California voted against Proposition 19, so it failed by a slim margin. Prop 19 would basically have legalized marijuana in California.

As the vote came in, Obama's drug czar gave this statement:
"Today, Californians recognized that legalizing marijuana will not make our citizens healthier, solve California's budget crisis, or reduce drug related violence in Mexico," read the statement. "The Obama administration has been clear in its opposition to marijuana legalization because research shows that marijuana use is associated with voluntary treatment admissions for addiction, fatal drugged driving accidents, mental illness and emergency room admissions."

The trite, but true, objection is that alcohol and tobacco are associated with a heck of a lot more than that, and you have no problem with them, either. In fact, here's what the British government's ex-drug czar had to say:

BBC: Alcohol 'more harmful than heroin' says Prof David Nutt

Alcohol is more harmful than heroin or crack when the overall dangers to the individual and society are considered, according to a study in the Lancet.

The report is co-authored by Professor David Nutt, the former government chief drugs adviser who was sacked in 2009.

It ranked 20 drugs on 16 measures of harm to users and to wider society.

Heroin, crack and crystal meth were deemed worst for individuals, with alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine worst for society, and alcohol worst overall.

The study by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs also said tobacco and cocaine were judged to be equally harmful, while ecstasy and LSD were among the least damaging.

(...)

"Our findings lend support to previous work in the UK and the Netherlands, confirming that the present drug classification systems have little relation to the evidence of harm," the paper says.

This is not, by any means, the only report to draw these conclusions, but our politicians are united in their determination to ignore them.

Another recent paper, in the British Journal of Criminology, had this to say:

Political reluctance to reform drug laws has been clearly demonstrated in recent years in the United Kingdom. Despite international evidence that rates of drug use are not directly affected by harsher punishment of drug users (Reuter and Stevens 2007; Degenhardt et al. 2008) (and pressure from multiple advocates), the British Government has firmly opposed any move towards decriminalization. Politicians have warned that decriminalization of cannabis would ‘send the wrong message’ (Home Affairs Committee Inquiry into Drug Policy 2002: para. 74). Some researchers (McKeganey 2007; Inciardi 2008; Singer 2008) have supported this argument, arguing that removing criminal penalties would lead to increased drug use, with harms falling hardest on the deprived communities that are already the most damaged by drug-related problems. However, most public arguments are based on speculation rather than the available evidence on effects.

The topic of the paper is the decriminalization of drugs in Portugal. Not a lot of people know that in 2001, Portugal decriminalized possession of almost all narcotics. The Scientific American summed up the results:

5 Years After: Portugal's Drug Decriminalization Policy Shows Positive Results

In the face of a growing number of deaths and cases of HIV linked to drug abuse, the Portuguese government in 2001 tried a new tack to get a handle on the problem—it decriminalized the use and possession of heroin, cocaine, marijuana, LSD and other illicit street drugs. The theory: focusing on treatment and prevention instead of jailing users would decrease the number of deaths and infections.

Five years later, the number of deaths from street drug overdoses dropped from around 400 to 290 annually, and the number of new HIV cases caused by using dirty needles to inject heroin, cocaine and other illegal substances plummeted from nearly 1,400 in 2000 to about 400 in 2006, according to a report released recently by the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C, libertarian think tank.

In case anyone is overly suspicious of the Cato Institute, their conclusions are upheld by the British study above. From its summary:

It disconfirms the hypothesis that decriminalization necessarily leads to increases in the most harmful forms of drug use. While small increases in drug use were reported by Portuguese adults, the regional context of this trend suggests that they were not produced solely by the 2001 decriminalization. We would argue that they are less important than the major reductions seen in opiate-related deaths and infections, as well as reductions in young people's drug use. The Portuguese evidence suggests that combining the removal of criminal penalties with the use of alternative therapeutic responses to dependent drug users offers several advantages. It can reduce the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system, while also reducing problematic drug use.

**

So, could we please start getting this into our heads? Legalizing drugs will have a positive net impact. So far, everyone who's done it has experienced improved public health and saved a heck of a lot of money in not having to put all those people through the justice system. Yet we refuse to acknowledge this, because we're still being gripped by a ridiculous moral panic on drugs. Couldn't we just stop?

The way I see it, if people want to get intoxicated, they're going to do it. The "war on drugs" is a massive failure because especially in the United States, it costs billions of dollars and puts untold people into prison while clearly failing to stop the drug trade. It's no more successful than the prohibition on alcohol was, and we gave that up as well.

If we actually come to our senses on the drug issue during my lifetime, I'll be pleasantly surprised.

Saturday, November 6, 2010

For Colored Girls and Every Girl

Verdict: 
GO SEE!

Why?
Tyler Perry's poetic, dramatic For Colored Girls is simply beautiful. It's also so heartbreaking. The movie, based on the play For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf, tells the tragic stories of 9 African American women (played amazingly and strongly by Janet Jackson, Whoopi Goldberg, Thandie Newton, Kimberly Elise, Kerry Washington, Loretta Devine, Phylicia Rashad, Anika Noni Rose and Tessa Thompson) brought together as they try to make sense and heal from the worst of the worst that has been bestowed upon them.
As hard as is to watch at times, as a whole it's a therapeutic film that all women should go see.
If any film of 2010 deserves to win an Oscar it's For Colored Girls.

REVIEW:
For Colored Girls is the first film I've seen all year that I believe is deserving of an Oscar win for Best Picture. 
And if the entire cast could receive an individual Oscar, this cast is worthy enough to.
It's that good--- extremely well-acted, unique story-telling, a real and raw script and just an engaging treat to watch.
Producer, director, screenwriter and actor Tyler Perry (Madea series) had done an outstanding job bringing Ntozake Shange's celebrated play For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf to life onto the movie screen.
The cast is a dream, with some of the best African American actresses in Hollywood playing lead roles: a stony Janet Jackson (Poetic Justice, Why Did I Get Married?/Too?) as Jo, a rich, cold-hearted unhappily married woman, a zany dressed in all white Whoopi Goldberg (Sister Act, The Color Purple) as Alice, a crazy religious mother, a wildly out of character Thandie Newton (Crash, 2012) as Tangie, a nymphomaniac and eldest daughter of Alice, an emotion-filled Kimberly Elise (Set It Off, John Q) as Crystal, an abused wife and mother of two, a smiley, pretty Anika Noni Rose (The Princess and the Frog, Dreamgirls) as Yasmine, a gifted ballet dancer, a colorful soprano voiced Loretta Devine (Death at a Funeral (2010), Woman Thou Art Loosed) as Juanita, a health worker who's in love with a womanizer, a mother-esque Phylicia Rashad (The Cosby Show t.v. series) as Gilda, the nosy neighbor of Tangie and Crystal, a gloom faced Kerry Washington (I Think I Love My Wife, Lakeview Terrace) as Kelly, a social worker who can't have kids and up-and-coming actress--- a cute, energetic Tessa Thompson as Nyla, a dancer in Yasmine's class and the sister of Tangie.
Some of the best acting ever is showcased when each of the women break out into hypnotic, beautiful monologues of poetry as their characters are at their most vulnerable moments.
All the women are harboring secrets and deal with some very painful, sad and terrible situations in the film.
You feel for each and every one of them to the point of tears, anger and shock.
*SPOILERS: One woman is raped (in a shocking scene which is so shocking because the guy who date-rapes her seemed like a good guy), another woman's children are killed in front of her by their father (such a jaw-dropping horrific scene), another woman goes to get a back alley (literally) abortion in the most dirtiest accommodations by the creepiest abortionist (a chilling, the singer Macy Gray) and another woman contacts HIV from her in-the-closet gay husband.*
Melodramatic?
Yes, but at the same time, it has to be, especially with the tragedies these characters face.
The men in For Colored Girls did excellent jobs portraying their characters as well, especially the bad characters--- they couldn't have been easy to play. 
Michael Ealy (Takers, Barbershop series) scarily plays Beau, the abusive, alcoholic husband of Crystal. Khalil Kain (Girlfriends t.v. series) is Bill, the not-as-he-seems man Yasmine dates. Omari Hardwick (The A-Team, Kick-Ass) is Carl, the in-the-closet gay husband of Jo. Hill Harper (Soul Food t.v. series) plays Donald, a cop and partner of Kelly, and is the only good guy in the film--- followed perhaps next by the can't-stop-cheating Frank, Juanita's partner, played by Richard Lawson (How Stella Got Her Groove Back).
Is For Colored Girls, 1995's Waiting To Exhale for this generation of African American women?
Perhaps.
Themes of sisterhood and man-bashing are within For Colored Girls just the same.
But For Colored Girls explores more of learning to love one's own-self and what that means when you're a woman and African American.
Although For Colored Girls is aimed at African American women, every woman of any color can relate to most of the issues the film touches upon.
I was happy to see not only black women but other races of women at the showing I was at. 
Maybe this is because For Colored Girls deals with so many themes that every woman can at relate to at least one of them.
It's a brave, beautiful, touching film that is made especially for colored girls and for every girl.
Here's to an Oscar!








 

Friday, November 5, 2010

Detroit Lion Time



"The pride is back in the Motorcity baby!"--Great line.

What's Playing? 11/5 Weekend



***

 This weekend in movie theatres, so many great looking films open.
I want to see everything (sans the CGI Megamind)!
My top pick is the beautiful looking drama, For Colored Girls produced and directed by Tyler Perry and starring some of the best African American female actresses in Hollywood.
Two based-on-true events, the thriller Fair Game, starring Naomi Watts and action drama 127 Hours are my other top picks.
The comedy Due Date, starring Robert Downey Jr. looks hilarious and the documentary Client 9, about Eliot Spitzer looks intriguing.
The animated kid friendly flick Megamind is my last pick to go see.


 Here is the run down of movies opening in theatres starting Friday are:




For Colored Girls

What's It About?
Eight African American women deal with conflict in their lives.

Why See It? 
-If you're female, especially, African American.
-Check out the cast!: Janet Jackson, Whoopi Goldberg, Phylicia Rashad, Kerry Washington, Thandie Newton to name a few.
-You love the play: For Colored Girls Who Considered Suicide When the Rainbow Is Enuf.



Why Skip It?
As lovely as it looks, it also looks heartbreaking.

Trailer:


*


Fair Game
What's It About?
The true story of undercover CIA agent Valerie Plame, whose identity was revealed to the public by the White House.

Why See It?
The story seems unexciting but presented in film, it seems exciting.


Why Skip It?
You'd rather rent Salt, starring Angelina Jolie.

Trailer:

*


127 Hours
What's It About?
The true story of Aron Ralston, a mountain climber who was trapped in between two boulders for almost five days who amputated his own arm to free himself.

Why See It?
For the incredible story.

Why Skip It?
You may faint from the amputation scene. 
The amputation scene supposedly has caused some people to faint in theatres.
*http://blog.moviefone.com/2010/09/06/danny-boyles-127-hours-too-intense/


Trailer:

*


Due Date
What's It About?
A man trying to reach his about to give birth wife, is forced to hitchhike with an eccentric stranger where everything that can go wrong, does go wrong.

Why See It?
-If the trailer is that laugh-out-loud funny, imagine the entire film!
-If you're a fan of The Hangover's Zach Galifianakis.

Why Skip It?
The trailer somehow didn't cause you to laugh.

Trailer:

*


Client 9
What's It About?
A documentary about the rise and fall (due to infidelity + prostitution) of former NY governor Eliot Spitzer.

Why See It?
You're interested to know more about Eliot Spitzer's rise and fall.
 
Why Skip It?
 You don't know who Eliot Spitzer is or care to hear his rise and fall story.

Trailer:

*


Megamind
What's It About?
A supervillian Megamind (voiced by Will Ferrell) wants to defeat his nemesis Metro Man (voiced by Brad Pitt).

Why See It?
-You're under 13.
-Or a fan of Brad Pitt.


Why Skip It?
You're over 13.

 
Trailer:




***
E N J O Y
*the*
M O V I E S
***

GOTW

Next week is Veteran's Day and I thought to myself, "how can I incorporate hot girls with honoring our nations veterans?"  Then it hit me:  ASIAN HOOKERS!  Thank you for serving your country and I hope you never get any venereal diseases while overseas.

A Second Video!

I saw this video over at filmdrunk the other day.  I saw it before somewhere and both sites make fun of Jake Lloyd for coming off as awkward.  To me, he seems more annoyed with the interviewer than anything.  Asking if he uses his role as Anakin to get girls?  If he still has any of the merchandise?

The funny thing to me is that people would be making fun of him if he was still clinging to that aspect of his life.  If his house was packed full of little Anakin figures everywhere, he would be a bit creepy.  Instead he says that he is finishing school and wants to be a film editor.  Good for him.  I can understand why he would be hesitant to do an interview after the way everyone made fun of his acting in Episode I.



I promise this will be the last video of the day.  I may even put up a GOTW...